Finish this sentence: “If you think that, well then you’ve got another…”
You may be surprised to learn that the way you finish that seemingly cliched phrase may actually offend people! Fortunately they’d be the kind of pedantic bastards that you’d concuss yourself with a dictionary just to avoid, so you needn’t worry too much, but nevertheless Incorrections is here to save the day and to help guide you headfirst into that minefield of social pahriety!
Pahriety1[puh–ṟahy–uh-tee] noun: 1. A party attended exclusively by social pariahs 2. ComiCon.
The sticking point comes with the words “thing” and “think”. Simple enough you’d think, some people have foolishly misheard the phrase “another think coming” as “another thing coming” or vice versa. Such folly! But here’s where it gets weird: neither can really be considered incorrect.
Plenty of debates have been had on the internet (well, more than the average ratio of topic-to-internet-debate) and plenty of statistics and dictionaries have been thrown around (not always metaphorically) citing sources and books and various institutions of learning, all of which hold the same kind of unquestioned authority in the world of language as Constable Clancy the Koala holds when drafted to a homicide investigation. (Constable Clancy the Koala being the foremost reason the reform of C to K should never, ever, take place).
Once everyone on the net calmed down a bit, and the doctors were done removing the shards of broken keyboard from the survivors of the great online debate of 5:37pm, everyone looked around and realised that the number of people on the ironically named Think side of the debate were pretty much equal to the opposing Things, which heavily implies that both sides could be considered not incorrect (it also heavily implies that people need to get out more).
As far as we can establish down here at the Incorrections Word Lab (i.e. the basement) the phrases probably grew out of the ‘thing’ derivation, with ‘think’ being a play on the original. If we had to guess (and this gun-wielding terrorist group of angry linguists is telling us that we do), the phrase probably started out as a masked threat:
“If you don’t give me back my lunch you’ll have something else (i.e. a knuckle sandwich) coming your way pretty quick.”
Then some poor innocent sole simply made the following pun, unaware he was about to unleash the literary equivalent of an A-Bomb onto an unsuspecting anglosphere.
“If you think that, well then you’ve got another think coming!”
See what they did there? HILARIOUS! Unfortunately for us the world is 1/10th people with no sense of humour, who upon hearing this, simply assumed it was the correct phrase for all situations, kept on using it regardless, and then went on to procreate somehow. Worse still another 5/10ths (or 1/2 for all you mathematicians out there) are just humour lemmings who will continue to use this ‘pun’ in all situations convinced that it is now somehow always humorous regardless of the obvious oncoming cliff face of unfunnyness until finally they topple over the edge in a shower of tiny furry jokes and yes it was a bad metaphor in retrospect.
All in all, if some people want to use the word ‘thing’ and some want to use the word ‘think’, it’s not that big an issue. Sure one might not make any sense out of context, but in fairness both rely heavily on the cliche factor anyway. Frankly I prefer to just flat out spurn the cliche altogether and threaten to murder the family of whomever I’m talking to, if I don’t like the direction they are taking. Cut to the chase I say!
When it comes to correctness in language, it always comes down to numbers, and in this unusual case opinion is divided down the middle. Sure you can cite one dictionary or one newspaper, but really people are just going to do what they’re gonna do. In the end, I feel at least, it’s really just not worth getting worked up about this kind of think.